Archive for State Department

3 Years After The Holocaust, US State Department Threatened To Encourage Antisemitic Outbreak

Our country.

Despicable, but not particularly surprising.

Historian Dr. Rafael Medoff discovered documents showing that the US State Department threatened to incite anti-Semitism in 1948 if the the Zionist leaders proclaimed the State of Israel, a statement released Thursday asserted.

According to the documents,then Undersecretary of State Robert Lovett told Zionist official Nahum Goldmann that the Truman administration opposed plans to declare the Jewish state. Lovett reportedly threatened to release a “White Paper” criticizing Zionists, which he said would have “grave repercussions” for Jews as anti-Semitism was mounting.

If Jewish people understood this, they might be more comfortable voting for Republicans. Part of the reason that Democrats win most of the Jewish votes has to do with liberal views among the Jewish population, but part of it has to do with history. Truman recognized Israel 15 minutes after she declared statehood. That is all that most elderly Jews know about the era. The fact that Roosevelt refused to intervene, to bomb the train tracks to Auschwitz or help the Jewish population of Europe directly, is not well-known. And this is completely new information to most of us.

- Aggie

Comments

Next Year in West Jerusalem!

If that’s okay with the Arabs, this is:

QUESTION: Is it the State Department’s position that Jerusalem is not part of Israel?

MS. NULAND: Well, you know that our position on Jerusalem has not changed. The first Media Note was issued in error without appropriate clearances. We reissued the note to make clear that Under Secretary – Acting Under Secretary for R, Kathy Stephens, will be traveling to Algiers, Doha, Amman, Tel Aviv, and Jerusalem. With regard to our Jerusalem policy, it’s a permanent status issue; it’s got to be resolved through negotiations between the parties.

QUESTION: Is it the view of the United States that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, notwithstanding the question about the Embassy, the location of the U.S. Embassy?

MS. NULAND: We are not going to prejudge the outcome of those negotiations, including the final status of Jerusalem.

QUESTION: Does that mean that you do not regard Jerusalem as the capital of Israel?

MS. NULAND: Jerusalem is a permanent status issue; it’s got to be resolved through negotiations.

QUESTION: That seems to suggest that you do not regard Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Is that correct or not?

MS. NULAND: I have just spoken to this issue –

QUESTION: No, no. But –

MS. NULAND: — and I have nothing further to say on it.

QUESTION: You’ve spoken to the issue but didn’t answer the question, and I think there’s a lot of people out there who are interested in hearing a real answer and not saying – and not trying to duck and say that this has got to be resolved by negotiations between the two sides.

MS. NULAND: That is our –

QUESTION: What is the capital of Israel?

MS. NULAND: Our policy with regard to Jerusalem is it has to be solved through negotiations. That’s all I have to say on this issue.

QUESTION: What is the capital of Israel?

MS. NULAND: Our Embassy, as you know, is located in Tel Aviv.

QUESTION: So does that mean that you regard Tel Aviv as the capital of Israel?

MS. NULAND: The issue on Jerusalem has to be settled through negotiations.

QUESTION: I just want to go back to – I want to clarify something.

MS. NULAND: Yeah.

QUESTION: Perhaps give you an out on your Jerusalem answer. Is it your position that all of Jerusalem is a final status issue or do you think – or is it just East Jerusalem?

MS. NULAND: Matt, I don’t have anything further to what I said 17 times on that subject. Okay?

QUESTION: All right. So hold on – so – I just want to make sure, you’re saying that all of Jerusalem, not just East Jerusalem, is a final status issue?

MS. NULAND: Matt, I don’t have anything further on Jerusalem to what I’ve already said. Please.

The reporter is being unfair. Ms. Nuland can’t redefine her boss’s (and her boss’s boss) offensive and ignorant policy toward Jerusalem.

A point made by Ileana Ros-Lehtinen:

“For more than three years, the Obama Administration has followed in the flawed footsteps of its predecessors by refusing to fully implement U.S. law and move our embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.

“Now, the Administration has gone even further. A mistake on a press release is understandable, but today the Administration doubled down on its determination to treat Jerusalem as separate from Israel. Where does the Administration think Jerusalem is? On Mars?

“Legitimizing the myth that Jerusalem isn’t part of Israel undermines our ally Israel’s sovereign right to designate its own capital, and lends credibility to efforts by Palestinian leaders and extremists who continue to deny the connection of the Jewish people to their historic capital, Jerusalem.

“The Administration needs to face reality, recognize publicly that Jerusalem is the undivided capital of Israel, and fully enforce U.S. law by moving our embassy to Jerusalem.”

If Jerusalem were on Mars, the UN’s Human Rights Council would declare it an illegal occupation and a daily humiliation of the Martian people.

Comments (3)

Outreach Outgunned

A blog I read from time to time, Arlene [Kushner] in Israel, twigged me to this story:

The United States ambassador to Spain recently met with a group of Muslim immigrants in one of the most Islamized neighborhoods of Barcelona to apologize for American foreign policymaking in the Middle East.

U.S. Ambassador Alan Solomont told Muslims assembled at the town hall-like meeting in the heart of Barcelona’s old city that the United States is not an “enemy of Islam” and that U.S. President Barack Obama wants to improve America’s image in the Middle East as quickly as possible by closing the “dark chapters” of the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the war in Afghanistan.

“There are things that the United States has done badly,” Solomont said at the February 28 gathering organized by a non-profit organization called the Cultural, Educational and Social Association of Pakistani Women. “But now the Obama government wants to improve relations with Muslims,” he promised.

The U.S. State Department — working through American embassies and consulates in Europe — has been stepping-up its efforts to establish direct contacts with largely unassimilated Muslim immigrant communities in towns and cities across Europe.

Proponents of Obama’s approach to public diplomacy — some elements of which originated with his immediate predecessor — say it is part of a “counter-radicalization” strategy which aims to prevent radical Muslims with European passports from carrying out terrorist attacks against the United States.

A key component of the strategy is to “empower” Muslims who can help build a “counter-narrative” to that of terrorists. In practice, however, Obama ideologues are crisscrossing Europe on U.S. taxpayer funded trips to “export” failed American approaches to multiculturalism, affirmative action, cultural diversity and special rights for minorities.

Further, American diplomats are repeatedly apologizing to Muslims in Europe for a multitude of real or imagined slights against Islam, and the U.S. State Department is now spending millions of dollars each year actively promoting Islam — including Islamic Sharia law — on the continent.

There’s one main problem with this approach: it’s hard to convince Moslems we’re their friends when we’re killing them. We may be justified in killing them (we are); we may observe that the Moslems we’re killing are the biggest killers of other Moslems (they are); but as the recent killings in Toulouse have reaffirmed, apologies and self-recrimination, let alone reason, do not make you popular among a radicalized ideology with which you are at war.

You may be surprised to learn that the European nations where Obama is doing this outreaching do not appreciate his meddling:

Ambassador William Eacho, an Obama campaign fundraiser turned political appointee, awarded the first prize to a group of students in the northern Austrian town of Steyr who produced a one-minute silent film promoting tolerance for Muslim women who wear Islamic face-covering veils such as burkas in public spaces.

Obama and his team may think they know what is best for Europeans, but according to recent polls, more than 70% of Austrians are in favor of a law that would ban the burka.

In Belgium, U.S. Ambassador Howard Gutman, another Obama fundraiser turned diplomat, told lawyers attending a conference in Brussels in November 2011 that Israel is to blame for Muslim anti-Semitism in Europe.

According to the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronot, Gutman, who is Jewish, showed conference attendees a video of himself receiving a warm welcome at a Muslim school in Brussels, which he said proved that Muslims are not anti-Semitic. Following a barrage of criticism for rationalizing the growing problem of anti-Semitism in Europe, the U.S. Embassy in Belgium removed the evidence by uploading an amended transcript of Gutman’s remarks on its website.

In France, the U.S. Embassy in Paris co-sponsored a seminar to teach Muslims in France how they can politically organize themselves. Operatives from the Democratic Party coached 70 Muslim “diversity leaders” from disaffected Muslim-majority suburban slums known as banlieues on how to develop a communications strategy, raise funds and build a political base.

The French government — which has been trying to reverse the pernicious effects of decades of state-sponsored multiculturalism — expressed dismay at what it called “meddling.”

I’ll bet they did—especially after Toulouse.

Europeans dismissed Bush as a “cowboy”. What is Obama, but a boy? (We pause here for the requisite outrage at using a racially tinged word. I use it not in that context—obviously—but to seize the theme of his naiveté, his cluelessness.)

As Aggie reports below, we had this maggot in our custody in Afghanistan—where we were killing one brand of Moslem to save another—but handed him over to the French. Okay.

PS: The Toulouse killings were no different from the slaughter in Itamar of the Fogel family—children massacred in the name of Arab nationalism—but who besides the Israelis mourns them?

PPS: Oh, this is Smart Power! Why didn’t you say so?

Comments (1)

Huh.

Iranian missiles to be able to hit Europe, US

Iran may develop inter-continental missiles that can reach the east coast of the United States in two to three years, Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz said in a CNBC interview Wednesday.

Iran is investing billions of dollars, Steinitz said, to develop inter-continental ballistic missiles. “We estimate that in 2-3 years they will have the first inter-continental ballistic missiles that can reach the east coast of America.”

“Their aim is clearly not only to be able to threaten Israel and the Middle East,” he continued, “but to put a direct nuclear ballistic threat to Europe and to the United States of America.”

Earlier Wednesday, Russia warned Israel not to attack Iran over its nuclear program, saying on Wednesday that military action would have catastrophic consequences.

“Of course any possible military scenario against Iran will be catastrophic for the region and for the whole system of international relations,” Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov said.

“Therefore I hope Israel understands all these consequences … and they should also consider the consequences of such action for themselves,” Gatilov said at a news conference.

Gatilov’s comments came as Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Wednesday that Tehran’s nuclear course would not change regardless of international sanctions, assassinations or other pressures.

So, gentle readers… will the US and Europe go appeasement on us? Will Israel be fed to the lions? Definitely.

- Aggie

Comments

CORRECTION Corrected

Yesterday, we corrected an earlier story to say that the Mo-Bro in Egypt would honor the peace treaty with Israel, after initially writing that they said they wouldn’t.

They won’t:

The Muslim Brotherhood denied on Saturday that it had assured Washington it would uphold the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty.

US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland told reporters on Thursday that the Islamist movement, the clear victor in the first round of elections for the Egyptian Parliament, pledged to honor the various treaties signed by previous Cairo governments, including the peace deal with Israel.

Nuland insisted that the various political parties in Egypt have offered the US “good guarantees” that the peace treaty will be observed. She stressed that Washington fully expects all of Cairo’s political factions to honor the previous regime’s international agreements.

According to Essam al-Erian, deputy head of the Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice party, the accords “are under the responsibility of the people and state institutions, and it would not be right for anyone to speak on behalf of the Egyptian people.”

Speaking to the London-based Arabic newspaper Al-Hayat, al-Erian said, “We are not in a position to give assurances.”

Rashad al-Bayoumi, the Brotherhood’s second in command, told Al-Hayat las week that “the Muslim Brotherhood will not recognize Israel under any circumstances and might put the peace treaty with the Jewish state up to a referendum.”

The Brotherhood, he added, “did not sign the peace accords… We are allowed to ask the people or the elected parliament to express their opinion on the treaty, and (to find out) whether it compromised the people’s freedom and sovereignty. We will take the proper legal steps in dealing with the peace deal. To me, it isn’t binding at all. The people will express their opinion on the matter.”

Until another politically appointed Obama stooge re-corrects the correction, we regret the error(s).

Comments

Medina Shore

He’s queer,
He’s not here,
Get used to it:

The United States government denied political asylum to Ali Ahmad Asseri, the former first secretary of the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles, last week to avoid disrupting US-Saudi relations, according to a Saudi-American blogger and journalist based in Brazil.

Asseri argued that if he returned to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia he would face execution because the country’s radically fundamental form of Islam mandates the death penalty for same-sex relations.

In an e-mail response to the Post on Saturday, Abou-Alsamh, the Saudi-American blogger whose personal website “Rasheed’s World” first broke the story about the denial of the asylum application, wrote, “As far as I know the US government has not yet officially commented on Asseri’s denial of asylum, but from comments that I have read after I wrote my post, it seems that political asylum cases are often denied in first instance and then approved later when the applicant appeals.”

He added: “I do think the US government is afraid of unnecessarily annoying the Saudis, especially now with all of the turmoil that the Arab world is going through because of the Arab Spring revolts.”

Seriously? We’re going to let the Saudis cut off his head(s) so as not to “unnecessarily annoy” them? All annoyance of Saudis is necessary.

But wait, there’s more:

“His initial interview with Homeland Security was very positive, but then they came back and grilled him for two days after they found out that he had worked in the public prosecutor’s office in Saudi Arabia,” Alsamh continued.

“He had been an inspector to make sure that judicial punishments, such as lashings, were carried out within the law – not more, not less. They then accused him of participating in a form of torture,” Ahmed said on Abou- Alamh’s website.

Ahmed said that Asseri intends to appeal the denial of his application and the process could meander its way through the judicial process over the next few years.

Last year, the US news organization MSNBC first reported on Asseri’s decision to remain in the United States. According to an article from the MSNBC national investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff: “Ali Ahmad Asseri, the first secretary of the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles, has informed US Department of Homeland Security officials that Saudi officials have refused to renew his diplomatic passport and effectively terminated his job after discovering he was gay and was close friends with a Jewish woman.”

Talk about burying the lead! Which is worse—that’s she’s Jewish or that she’s a she? After they behead him, they’ll have to sew it back on and behead him all over again.

What about it, President Obama? Are you going to annoy the Saudis (who don’t vote) or the gay community and their Jewish f*g hag friends (who do)?

Comments (2)

Remember When Settlements Were Legal?

It wasn’t all that long ago:

Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright
Interview by Matt Lauer, The Today Show – NBC TV
New York, New York, October 1, 1997

MR. LAUER: But do you think you were blind-sided by the Prime Minister?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I wasn’t happy. We had had a conversation, and I felt that going forward with those kinds of buildings was not helpful. It is not in any way not part of what they can do, but they shouldn’t do it.

MR. LAUER: It’s legal.

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: It’s legal. But I think that, in this kind of an atmosphere, it’s very important not to take actions that are viewed by the other side as creating more difficulties.

So, settlement is legal, but in a circumlocution worthy of her boss (don’t say circumlocution in front of him—it makes him horny), “It is not in any way not part of what they can do, but they shouldn’t do it.”

How about breathing? Is that “in any way not part of what they can do”?

Anyway, the gray suits of the State Department rode to the rescue:

QUESTION: However, in her Today Show interview this morning, the Secretary was asked if the settlements are legal. And she said, quote, “they are legal.” Was she talking about legal within the context of Israeli law? Or was she talking about international law, specifically the Fourth Geneva Convention?

MR. FOLEY: No, she was not talking about international law. Our overall position on the question of the legality of settlements remains the same. We are, of course, not taking a legal position on that overall issue. We believe, as I stated, that settlements are very unhelpful to the peace
process.

The Secretary of State says settlements are legal; some Foggy Bottom panjandrum says they aren’t—while in the same breath denying taking a legal position. Is it any wonder some of us think there is an anti-Israeli settlement unhelpfully embedded in the State Department?

And another one in the media? Else why is Madame Secretary’s position not more widely known?

Comments

Arab Spring, Anti-Jewish Rioting In Egypt

This is a direct result of US foreign policy under the leadership of Barack Obama.

The Israelis airlifted their Ambassador out of the Embassy, which had been breached by the mob. Thank you, Mr. President.

Israel airlifted its ambassador home and sought U.S. intervention with Egypt to help protect its embassy here early Saturday, hours after thousands of Egyptian protesters besieged the building, with several managing to gain entry and fling Hebrew-language documents from a balcony.

Protesters knocked down a 12-foot concrete wall that had been built last week to protect the embassy, which is near the top floor of a 21-story residential building in the upscale Dokki area. At least two protesters scaled the front of the building to pull down the Israeli flag, hanging from the 20th floor. It was the second time in recent weeks that demonstrators had removed the flag.

The crowd burned Israeli flags and threw rocks at security forces as protesters denounced the deaths of several Egyptian border guards last month. The guards were killed as Israeli troops pursued militants who they said had crossed into Egypt from Gaza to attack the Israeli resort town of Eilat.

Late Friday, protesters appeared to have reached the embassy’s foyer, throwing documents from a balcony, said an Israeli official quoted by Reuters news agency. It was not clear whether the documents were sensitive. Egyptian security forces used tear gas and sent a string of armored personnel carriers to try to clear away the protesters.

Egyptian Deputy Health Minister Hamid Abaza told the Associated Press that at least three people died and more than 1,000 were hurt during the street clashes with police. Earlier the state-run Middle East News Agency said that 448 people were injured in the fighting around the embassy, including 46 police officers.

In Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the incident, which led to the departure of the Israeli ambassador and nearly all of his staff, a serious breach of bilateral relations.

“The fact that Egyptian authorities ultimately acted with determination is laudable,” Netanyahu was quoted as saying by an official in his office. “That said, Egypt cannot conduct business as usual after this harsh blow to the fabric of relations with Israel and gross violation of international norms.”

I fear that we may see a re-play of the 6 Day War, all as a result of the ineptitude of Mr. Hope and Change and the flat-out ignorance of those who voted for him.

Here’s more, from the Israeli press:

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke by phone with guards at the Israeli embassy in Cairo as they were besieged by an Egyptian mob on Saturday, reassuring them they would be rescued, aides said.

They said that after demonstrators penetrated the tower block housing the mission, some of the six-member staff on overnight security detail told Netanyahu they feared for their lives and asked him to pass farewells to their families.

“All that separated them from the mob, at that point, was one wall. We were very concerned, and so were they,” said an aide.

After telephoned appeals by Netanyahu to Cairo’s interim military rulers and the Obama administration, Egyptian security forces extracted the guards before dawn. Another Netanyahu aide said the Israelis’ heads were covered to throw off the crowds.

Isn’t that sickening?

cairo-mob.jpg

- Aggie

Comments (2)

Their Hearts an Minds Will Follow

Ileana Ros-Lehtinen has the UN in such an uncomfortable grip, I expect her to ask Banki Moon to turn his head and cough:

The U.S. State Department has slammed a Florida lawmaker for trying to block the Palestinian Authority from seeking recognition as a new country and membership in the United Nations in September.

U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen announced Tuesday she had advanced a measure to block U.S. funding to any U.N. member or group that supports an upgrade to the PA’s diplomatic status next month.

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland told reporters the Republican Congresswoman’s proposed measure would “seriously undermine our international standing and dangerously weaken the U.N. as an instrument to advance U.S. national security goals.”

The measure is actually a clause folded into a larger proposed bill that would transform the U.S. portion of United Nations funding into a voluntary contribution, one conditional upon American agreement on each funding target.

“We believe in U.N. reform,” added Nuland, “[but] we just don’t think that this is the right way to go about it.” The Obama administration warned long before Ros-Lehtinen submitted her proposal that the president would oppose it, according to the Reuters news agency.

That is a classic “but-monkey”, as Laura Ingraham would call it. This is the same State Department that considers Bashar Assad, the Syrian Assassin, the Chinless Optician, a “reformer”.

Squeeze a little tighter, Ileana!

Comments (1)

Just Another “Unhelpful” Jewish Settlement?

If Ariel’s a settlement, then London and Paris are quaint riverside burgs:

The Interior Ministry’s Planning and Construction Committee has approved the building of 277 new housing units in Ariel, defying international criticism of continued construction on land the Palestinians claim for a state.

The planned construction in Ariel – the core of the settlement bloc farthest inside the West Bank – is the third project on disputed lands to be advanced in the past week. Israel has recently moved ahead on plans to build more than 2,500 new apartments in disputed east Jerusalem, and Israeli officials say 2,700 more will be approved soon.

“We think unilateral actions by both sides, Israeli or Palestinian, are not helpful to the process to try to get both parties back to the table,” US Embassy spokesman Kurt Hoyer said.

In Washington, the State Department called the new Israeli building “deeply troubling.”

Look at the picture and tell me how 277 new homes would be “unhelpful”. While the Palestinians might call something like Ariel a “refugee camp”, I’d call it a thriving small city.

But ’twas not always thus:

At the beginning of 1978, a group of Israelis formed in order find a location in the hills of the northern part of the West Bank to create a new residential area. The made a formal request to the government to be given land to build a new community and were given three options by the army; the area near the ‘lone tree’ which would later become Barkan, the area which would later become Kfar Tapuach, and a hill near Kifl Hares that was known to the local Arabs as ‘ Jabel Mawat’, the hill of death, because of inhospitable terrain.

The leader of this group, Ron Nachman, chose the spot because of its strategic location on a possible Jordanian invasion route towards Israel’s main population centre of Tel Aviv. In the spring of 1978, some of the group’s men erected tents on the chosen hilltop, and in August 1978, a total of forty families came to live.

Maybe my information is incorrect, but I don’t see any Palestinian land claims on a place they once referred to as the “hill of death”. Yet it is now a robust Jewish community: 18,000+ residents and another 8,500 students.

To be honest with ourselves, the Bush State Department probably would have frowned on this development too, but that makes our reaction no more palatable. Even if the 277 units means 1,000 more people, that’s barely over a 5% increase. And look at the picture again: it’s not like they build McMansions on sprawling grounds.

Not bad for 30 years work in inhospitable terrain.

Comments (1)

« Previous entries Next Page » Next Page »