The number of homeless children in the United States has surged in recent years to an all-time high, amounting to one child in every 30, according to a comprehensive state-by-state report that blames the nation’s high poverty rate, the lack of affordable housing and the effects of pervasive domestic violence.
Titled “America’s Youngest Outcasts,” the report being issued Monday by the National Center on Family Homelessness calculates that nearly 2.5 million American children were homeless at some point in 2013. The number is based on the Education Department’s latest count of 1.3 million homeless children in public schools, supplemented by estimates of homeless preschool children not counted by the agency.
The problem is particularly severe in California, which has about one-eighth of the U.S. population but accounts for more than one-fifth of the homeless children, totaling nearly 527,000.
Follow my line of thinking: California has lots of illegal aliens; California has lots of homeless children; Obama wants to let in (has already let in) thousands more illegal (hence homeless) children.
I can never remember—is he Dumb or Dumber?
After soaring in the years since the recession, use of food stamps, one of the federal government’s biggest social-welfare programs, is beginning to decline.
There were 46.2 million Americans on food stamps in May, the latest data available, down 1.6 million from a record 47.8 million in December 2012. Some 14.8% of the U.S. population is on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, down from 15.3% last August, U.S. Department of Agriculture data show.
Okay, it’s not that good:
Food-stamp use remains high, historically speaking. The share of Americans on the benefit—which lets them buy basics like cereal and meat and treats like cookies, but not tobacco, alcohol or pet food—is above the 8% to 11% that prevailed before the financial crisis.
Back to the homeless kids:
Child homelessness increased by 8 percent nationally from 2012 to 2013, according to the report, which warned of potentially devastating effects on children’s educational, emotional and social development, as well as on their parents’ health, employment prospects and parenting abilities.
That was during years three and four of the “recovery”. And after nearly a trillion dollars in “stimulus”. Almost six years of Obamanomics, fifty years of the so-called Great Society—anybody want to try something different? Maybe Reaganomics? Again? Or do you want to double-down on Elizabeth Warren?
The only downside of the burgeoning reporting (better late than never) of Obama’s corruption is that it overshadows the reporting (or lack thereof) of his incompetence.