“I Am a Dream!”

I wish I had thought of that, but to give credit where it’s due, a German newspaper (of all places) summarized President Obama that way, as quoted by David Warren:

Obama’s is a different, more insidious vanity. He acknowledges his rhetorical gift as a gift, but imagines the solutions to problems coalesce of their own accord in his presence. He is President Orpheus, the “poet king,” transforming nature with his music. The German weekly, Die Zeit, expressed this perfectly in a headline: “I am a dream!”

And he’s not a fan:

[H]e is playing this game with a child’s understanding of the history and the stakes.

The Cairo speech is loaded with historical howlers. Other writers have explicated his misconceptions about Israel, and Hamas; about the American history in Iran; even his ridiculous notions about America’s earliest engagements with Islam. With short space, I leave that to them, but will draw attention to two grand statements, so fatuous as to beggar belief:

“As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam. It was Islam — at places like Al-Azhar University — that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe’s Renaissance and Enlightenment.”

And: “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition.”

No serious “student of history” could possibly have made either remark. The former is just bosh; the latter is incredibly offensive to western Christendom, quite apart from the laughable anachronism.

It would be wrong to demean the real achievements of Islamic civilization to advance western vanities. But also the reverse: it is wrong to demean the real achievements of Christendom, in the service of Islamic vanities even more absurd. And to do the latter, after presenting oneself as a Christian, is to sell out one’s whole society and being.

We may accommodate the playful, but the U.S. president was not being playful here. Or rather, he was playing with fire, as I know from some familiarity with the audience he was addressing. He was playing to the crowd, and in this case, playing to the tragic and self-destructive modern Arab propensity to blame every Arab problem on the machinations of outsiders.

The speech did not merely miss an opportunity to speak the truth plainly. It sabotaged every effort to speak the truth plainly, to the darkest tyrannical forces in the Islamic world. It sold out America, it sold out the West, and it sold out the Muslims, too.

This military wife also found THE SPEECH (eech-eech) wanting:

Obama is so taken with himself, he sends a thrill up his own leg.

For the rest of us, he’s sciatica.

3 Comments »

  1. Carol said,

    June 7, 2009 @ 8:43 am

    Obama’s understanding of anything does not extend beyond the first three paragraphs of the one, only New York Times story he read.

  2. Bloodthirsty Liberal said,

    June 7, 2009 @ 11:48 am

    I have one question: How could he stand in front of a crowd in Egypt, discussing Jewish/Muslim relations, and not mention the fact that in the 50’s Egypt stole Jewish property and expelled all the Jews from Egypt? That is an inconvenient truth, but true, nevertheless. They exiled their Jewish population.

    - Aggie

  3. Obama is Less Than He Seems said,

    June 7, 2009 @ 8:43 pm

    And what should we have expected from someone who wrote 2 books about his own non-existent “accomplishments”? What suprises us about a man with little real experience who told us he was qualified because he managed his own campaign? The past is prologue? Gee, who woulda thunk THAT…..

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment