UN Can Dish It Out But They Can’t Take It
Ann Bayevsky of UN Watch thrown out; UN lies about it to media
What a weird, weird organization.
The United Nations detained an outspoken critic and booted her from its New York headquarters in what the woman, a human rights watchdog, is calling an effort to silence her opposition to the world body.
Anne Bayefsky claims that as retaliation for giving a two-minute impromptu speech defending Israel, her 25-year career of monitoring the U.N. is now in jeopardy — likely to be placed in the hands of a committee chaired by the genocidal regime in Sudan.
Bayefsky gets special access to U.N. meetings in her capacity as the director of a non-governmental organization, the Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust at New York’s Touro College.
But the longtime U.N. observer has found herself in what she calls a “Kafkaesque” gray zone, where the U.N. confiscated her credentials, then denied to reporters that her access had been blocked.
“This is no accident,” she told FoxNews.com, arguing that she is being denied access to vital meetings concerning her prime focus: defending Israel. “This is keeping [the U.N.’s] major critic absent during the heart of the year.”
Following a vote Nov. 5 at the U.N. General Assembly, a microphone was set up outside the UNGA chamber for delegates to tout their endorsement of the controversial Goldstone Report, which accuses Israel of committing war crimes during its invasion of Gaza last winter.
Without an invitation, Bayefsky approached the empty podium to offer what she thought would be a counter-balance to speeches from the Libyan president of the UNGA and the Palestinian observer, who both supported the resolution.
“I didn’t expect that there would be a problem at all,” said Bayefsky, who noted that she and other NGOs have spoken there in the past without incident. (Archived U.N. video shows an official from the NGO Human Rights Watch speaking in praise of the U.N. at the same podium in May 2007.)
Bayefsky blasted the Goldstone Report and called the U.N. a “laughingstock” for singling out Israel and ignoring human rights violations committed by the terrorist organization Hamas against Israeli and Palestinian civilians during the three-week campaign in December and January.
“This is a resolution that purports to be evenhanded; it is anything but,” she said of the document approved by the UNGA. “It is a travesty — it calls for accountability, and in fact what we see instead is impunity for the Palestinian side.”
Soon after she finished speaking, Bayefsky was swarmed by four U.N. security guards, who brought her to their security office, confiscated her NGO pass and kicked her out of the building, she said.
But the U.N. told reporters a different story at a press conference Tuesday — claiming that there has been no change in status for Bayefsky, even as she continues to sit in limbo.
“The credentials of her organization are not changed at this stage,” said Farhan Haq, spokesman for U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. “It’s possible in the future that there could be a review, but at this stage there’s been no removal of credentials from that NGO or from Ms. Bayefsky.”
U.N. security officials became angered with Bayefsky after they realized she had brought an assistant to the U.N. proceedings without getting him a personal pass — a breach of protocol that led to a full-fledged investigation by the security office.
But Bayefsky says that the content of her speech is what rubbed U.N. officials the wrong way. She says supporters of the Goldstone report “are going to do everything in their power to silence anyone who gets in their way.”
Following her speech, the Permanent Observer of Palestine to the United Nations, Riyad Mansour, was informed that a pro-Israel NGO had spoken after him, and reportedly asked a member of the press, “Did we capture them?”
Later, as she pleaded her case before being forcibly removed from the General Assembly building, a security official told Bayefsky that “the Palestinian ambassador is very upset at the statement you made,” she told FoxNews.com.
U.N. officials denied that politics had anything to do with their handling of Bayefsky, and said it was purely an issue of protocol.
“She came to the microphone unannounced, unauthorized and unwarranted. It’s so simple,” said Jean-Victor Nkolo, a spokesman for the president of the General Assembly. “It’s nothing personal against Ms. Bayefsky at all. But it’s just that this cannot be allowed.”
Though her speech was broadcast live online, the footage was removed from the main proceedings made available by the U.N. on its Web site. Video of Bayefsky’s two-minute talk, which first streamed live, has been posted online on YouTube.
I deeply resent my tax dollars going to fund that wacko organization.
- Aggie
Carol said,
November 19, 2009 @ 9:49 pm
When I am in charge, things will be different. We might remain a member of this silly organization just to annoy these dreadful people, but we will never ever pay our bills. At a minimum, we will deduct charges for all parking tickets ever issued since 1945 to these ridiculous bastards, and also deduct money to cover all the bad tips these horrid foreigners left, and on and on and on.
And with at most 12 hours notice, we will most assuredly and unceremoniously kick those bastards out of our country.
Bloodthirsty Liberal said,
November 20, 2009 @ 6:52 am
Carol, When you rule the world, can we collect on President Obama’s tickets from his days at Harvard Law School, please?
- Aggie
Joe O'Neill said,
November 20, 2009 @ 9:51 am
I have all ways supported the idea of having nothing to do with the United Nations, if there was no such thing as the UN, within hours of the Maersk being attacked by pirates, the US government would (could) have sent a task force to blast the home bases of the pirates and there would be no need to worry about any consequences.Nowadays if the US should be bold enough to catch a pirate they are obliged to feed them and take them to a court somewhere and then probably let them free in the US or some other haven.
Carol said,
November 20, 2009 @ 10:39 pm
Absolutely, Aggie, with interest. 30% at least.