Do it for the Children
Shouldn’t Mark Steyn receive a royalty check for this?
More than 30 years after China’s one-child policy was introduced, creating two generations of notoriously chubby, spoiled only children affectionately nicknamed “little emperors,” a population crisis is looming in the country.
The average birthrate has plummeted to 1.8 children per couple as compared with six when the policy went into effect, according to the U.N. Population Division, while the number of residents 60 and older is predicted to explode from 16.7 percent of the population in 2020 to 31.1 percent by 2050. That is far above the global average of about 20 percent.
The imbalance is worse in wealthy coastal cities with highly educated populations, such as Shanghai. Last year, people 60 and older accounted for almost 22 percent of Shanghai’s registered residents, while the birthrate was less than one child per couple.
I was having a friendly discussion with someone the other day, during which the other person claimed that socialism did have a successful model, in Europe. I had two responses (and chose the third, to nod thoughtfully): one, that Europe does not have true socialism, but just a spectrum of welfare states; two, that whatever you call what they practice, it’s successful only in the short term, if at all.
Again, to credit Steyn, you can ratchet up all the yummy, generous social programs you want if you don’t have to pay for your self defense (thanks to Uncle Sam), and if you have no kids to take care of. Just don’t think you can get old. The European welfare model is good for one generation, tops. But retiring at 55, after maybe twenty years of working (those advanced degrees take time), and ample vacation time, works only if there’s another generation—your kids—to pay for your golden years (all three decades of them, thanks to medical advances).
Oops, did I write “kids”? I meant “kid”—or 1.3 kids, give or take a freckle or two. Hey, at least they didn’t abuse the recklessly generous maternity and paternity leaves offered throughout Europe. All well-meaning and humane—but none of it affordable.
China can just crush its swelling geezer population with tanks (they took out the wrong demographic in 1989); does Europe even have nay tanks?
