Bloodthirsty Liberal

I’ll spare you the messy details, but I’ve fantasized about Sarah Palin’s palm, too.

But the MSM is positively perverse on the subject. Get your own fantasies, you creepy bunch of sickos!

Which you know they have. Andrea Mitchell lowers herself into a hot bubble bath. She closes her eyes and lets out a deep breath. Thoughts, impure thoughts, spill into her imagination. They involve basketballs and microphones, whipped cream and arugula. She wakes with a start as Alan Greenspan steps in opposite her.

I’d share Chris Matthews’ fantasies, but I’d be shut down by the FCC before the thrill got halfway up his leg.

But while you’re obsessing compulsively over a five-point outline Sarah wrote on her soft, white, gentle, perfect palm, you pervs, you missed a much, much bigger embarrassment:

The president can’t even talk to sixth graders without a pair of teleprompters and a Secret Service agent ready to take a bugger for the president.

“I do not like them, Sam-I-Am. I do not like green eggs and ham.”

I swear, when he tells his fat tubs of goo daughters a bedtime story, he must have a team of writers and a prompter at ha…

What’s that, you say, too mean?

Don’t talk to me. Talk to them:

“We went to our pediatrician all the time,” [Michelle] Obama said. “I thought my kids were perfect — they are and always will be — but he [the doctor] warned that he was concerned that something was getting off balance.”

…

“But we often simply don’t realize that those kids are our kids, and our kids could be in danger of becoming obese. We always think that only happens to someone else’s kid — and I was in that position.”

I won’t name which pretty little girl in question, out of respect for her privacy. But then, I don’t have to:

President Obama is also guilty of talking about his daughters’ weight. In an interview with Parents magazine in November 2008, the president said, “A couple of years ago — you’d never know it by looking at her now — Malia was getting a little chubby.”

You take that back, sir!

Just what all girls need: the commander in chief and leader of the free world—and his lady—opining on the BMI of all girls everywhere. Whoever wrote that on the teleprompter should be taken out and shot.

Is there a contrast to be made between Palin’s attitude toward her Down’s Syndrome son (”he’s perfect”) and Obama’s cute daughter (”she’s chubby”)?

Next time the media turns to Levi Johnston for the inside poop on the Palin family, they might want to remember what his primary occupation is: deadbeat dad.

Sarah Palin’s oldest daughter, Bristol, is seeking child support from Levi Johnston, the father of her 1-year-old son. A court document says she is providing nearly all of the care for the baby, Tripp, and is seeking $1,750 a month. She says Mr. Johnston has paid only $4,400 in more than a year. His lawyer, Rex Butler, says that his client wanted to give money for the baby’s care on several occasions, requesting that Ms. Palin bring Tripp with her, but that she was a no-show.

Let’s hear a little more about that:

Attorney Rex Butler tells TMZ, Levi has told Bristol on several occasions he wanted her to come to his house to pick up checks for Tripp’s support. Butler says Levi also told her “it would be nice” if she brought Tripp along when she picked up the checks, because Levi wanted to spend time with his son. Butler says on each occasion Bristol was a no-show.

Butler says Bristol is partly to blame for the fact that she hasn’t gotten the support she wants. Butler tells TMZ on one occasion Levi was prepared to hand over $3,000 … but Bristol never showed.

As for why Levi didn’t just put the check in the mail … Butler says, “Why should he have to do that. He’s not dangerous to her.”

As we first reported, Bristol filed legal docs late Thursday asking for $1,750 a month in child support from Levi, claiming he’s only paid $4,400 since Tripp was born. Levi’s manager says the Playgirl model has forked over more than $10K.

Now, I’m still happily married (knock on wood!), so I’d have to ask the divorced parents among our readership if this is how it’s supposed to work.

Can you just roll up whenever you feel like it and drop off a check when you have the money? Or even worse, force the recipient of child support to come and get the check? Is that how it works? And you have a right to demand to see the very child for which you are currently not paying?

Not a bad deal.

I read that Bristol is also looking to get sole custody of Tripp. Whatever she does, she’d better do it through the court. Something tells me that one way or another Levi’s going to end up in jail.

Look at her: can’tcha tell?

I voted for Obama for me, not for you. I voted for hope and change and all the intangibles that Obama was peddling in the wake of the financial crisis, Sarah Palin, Sept. 11 and all the other ills that shook our country in the last decade. I wanted something new. Something different. What I got was, I suppose, exactly what I voted for - a spin doctor. And not a very good one at that.

…

Seven years later, I am ashamed to say that I was blinded by charisma. Obama was so convincing that I stopped caring about what he knew and started getting caught up in the euphoria. Imagine having a president who came from a broken home, who had money troubles, who did grass-roots community service? A young father. The first black president. It pains me to admit I got caught up in the hoopla.

“What I got was, I suppose, exactly what I voted for.” You can say that again, sister. And you can dry those tears and blow your nose, because we aren’t interested. Here’s a quarter—call someone who cares.

But if the reader is wondering how Sarah Palin got lumped in with 9/11, the financial crisis, and other “ills that shook our country”, let the writer explain:

Before John McCain unwittingly picked a tabloid-magazine cover girl for his running mate… as soon as Palin climbed out of her igloo and onto the national scene, well, there was no turning back for me… I felt my choice was to risk McCain dropping dead and letting the world’s most well-known hockey mom run this country… between picking Palin, suggesting that the first debates be delayed and, well, picking Palin

…

I want a president with experience and savvy, a Commander in Chief who puts our country and its citizens first.

I only hope the Republicans can find him the next time around.

Why, so you can turn your snooty nose in the air and justify your superiority to him/her, too? You don’t have to like Sarah Palin (God knows, many don’t), but if this is the level at which you make political choices, do the nation a favor and stay home on election day. You give the 19th amendment a bad name.

If a man had written what this dingbat wrote, NOW would cut off his balls—if they had any themselves.

I wish the dumb sumbitch had won the election, but even at 5-7, he towers above his colleagues:

“It was thorough, and it was complete, and I am so proud that Sarah Palin agreed to be my running mate,” he said in response to a question about the vetting. “And the facts are stubborn things, as Ronald Reagan used to say. The fact is that it energized our party. It gave us a very much-needed impetus, and Sarah Palin’s popularity continues very strongly to this day. And the hysterical attacks from the liberal left are ample indication of the threat that she poses to the liberal left and especially the feminist, radical-left movement in this country.”

McCain said he recently spoke to Palin to congratulate her on her new gig as a Fox News political analyst.

“And she’ll be coming to Arizona, I’m sure,” he said.

Some have questioned why Palin, Rush, et al haven’t been seen anywhere near the Brown campaign. I love them both, but Scott chose his Republican friends wisely. Only John McCain and Rudy Giuliani, among all national Republicans, have cut spots or made appearances. Both play well here.

From Sarah Palin’s Facebook page:

Why is Governor Schwarzenegger pushing for the same sorts of policies in Copenhagen that have helped drive his state into record deficits and unemployment? Perhaps he will recall that I live in our nation’s only Arctic state and that I was among the first governors to create a sub-cabinet to deal specifically with climate change. While I and all Alaskans witness the impacts of changes in weather patterns firsthand, I have repeatedly said that we can’t primarily blame man’s activities for those changes. And while I did look for practical responses to those changes, what I didn’t do was hamstring Alaska’s job creators with burdensome regulations so that I could act “greener than thou” when talking to reporters.

That’s going to leave a mark.

Sarah knows a thing or two about energy and its effect on humankind:

Todd and I would like to offer our best wishes to the Jewish community as they celebrate Hanukkah. Known as the Festival of Lights, Hanukkah commemorates the eight-day miracle that took place when the Temple in Jerusalem was rededicated. Though there was only enough consecrated oil for one day, the flame miraculously burned for eight – just long enough to prepare more. This beautiful story is rich with life lessons for members of all faiths. With hope and dedication nothing is impossible, and the Almighty never abandons those who seek the light.

What she said.

Meanwhile, President Obama is giving Jews the here’s-your-hat-what’s-your-hurry treatment.

Once you’ve stared down a bull moose (from 150 yards away, through a telescopic sight), William Shatner isn’t so scary. In fact, it’s hard to tell the two apart.

Sarah Palin wrote an op ed piece for the Washington Post (sending liberals into a terminal tizzy).

Al Gore called her a name.

Sarah Palin cleans his clock:

The response to my op-ed by global warming alarmists has been interesting. Former Vice President Al Gore has called me a “denier” and informs us that climate change is “a principle in physics. It’s like gravity. It exists.”

Perhaps he’s right. Climate change is like gravity – a naturally occurring phenomenon that existed long before, and will exist long after, any governmental attempts to affect it.

However, he’s wrong in calling me a “denier.” As I noted in my op-ed above and in my original Facebook post on Climategate, I have never denied the existence of climate change. I just don’t think we can primarily blame man’s activities for the earth’s cyclical weather changes.

Former Vice President Gore also claimed today that the scientific community has worked on this issue for 20 years, and therefore it is settled science. Well, the Climategate scandal involves the leading experts in this field, and if Climategate is proof of the larger method used over the past 20 years, then Vice President Gore seriously needs to consider that their findings are flawed, falsified, or inconclusive.

Vice President Gore, the Climategate scandal exists. You might even say that it’s sort of like gravity: you simply can’t deny it.

- Sarah Palin

On any playground I grew up on, Al Gore just got beat up by a girl, and a pretty one at that.

He’s writing about Sarah Palin’s book

When I walked into the Strand Bookstore in Manhattan last week, I headed straight for the bright young thing who wore an “Ask Me” button, and asked her to point me to the section of the store where I might find Sarah Palin’s memoir, “Going Rogue: An American Life.” She looked at me as if I had requested a copy of “Mein Kampf” signed in blood by the author, and directed me to the nearest Barnes and Noble, where, presumably, readers of dubious taste and sensibility could find what they wanted.

A few days later, I attended a seminar on political and legal theory where a distinguished scholar observed that every group has its official list of angels and devils. As an example, he offered the fact (of which he was supremely confident) that few, if any, in the room were likely to be Sarah Palin fans. By that time I had begun reading Palin’s book, and while I wouldn’t count myself a fan in the sense of being a supporter, I found it compelling and very well done.

Aren’t academics and pseudo-intellectuals (pronounced swado-intellectuals) silly? They tell themselves and each other that they understand things in the goofiest way possible? They uptalk a lot, putting a question mark at the end of a statement. They are infuriating. I only wish that the article included a picture of the silly woman with the “Ask Me” button who told the writer to go to Barnes and Noble.

So, does our college prof like the Palin book?

The questions to ask then are (1) Does Palin succeed in conveying to her readers the kind of person she is? and (2) Does she do it in a satisfying and artful way? In short, is the book a good autobiographical read? I would answer “yes” to both.

How much longer will he get to keep his blog at the NY Times?

These are the first two comments:

You went to the Strand and asked the staff where you can find Palin’s “autobiography” and you got attitude? Of course you did. It’s the Strand. They love good books there. My favorite store in the world.

Egad, Professor Fish.

- Aggie

That’s Andrea Mitchell of NBC News ambushing Sarah Palin at a book signing (via Weasel Zippers). They’re both wearing red, so I’ll point out that Mitchell is on the right, Palin on the left. It’s okay, I confuse them all the time.

Just look at the grim-faced, jaw-clenched hatred—undisguised contempt—on Mitchell’s face. Palin couldn’t be more gracious.

I wonder if Mitchell is so angry because her book is ranked #2,781,243 at Amazon, while Palin’s print run has just been increased to about that same number (and is #1). Funny coincidence.

PS: I wondered if there was anything about this stunt on MSNBC’s website, but can’t find any sign of Mitchell getting pwned by Palin and the police.

Though this photo—same dress, same earrings and bracelets, same smile, same occasion—proves they were there.

start at about 24 minutes and watch the thought process of the woman on the left develop

This is quick and easy; the lever under the screen works well. I haven’t had time to view the entire interview, but what I have seen is fascinating. The woman on the right is a professor of constitutional law at UW Madison. She is a moderate who voted for Obama and is now disappointed by his “Leftie” approach - her words. And she does a great job, an entertaining job, of defining what that means. Watch the “deer in the headlights” pantomime, it’s great. The woman on the right drank the Kool Aid. The law professor points out that Obama is not a leader, but a real good looking guy who is always campaigning. And she says that Palin has “authenticity” but is also very attractive. The bottom line is that Americans want a pretty face. And Palin is the conservative Obama.

I’m asking our readers to watch other parts of this film and report areas in the comment section that might be worth a look-see.

Update: Check out the video at about the 8 minute mark. The law prof explains what a disaster Barack Obama is as President and further, that Palin is certainly no more embarrassing than he. The liberal can’t believe her ears. She is stunned.

- Aggie