Fox Butterfield, Is That You?

Man, some people never learn! [Title courtesy of James Taranto]

Despite steeply declining violent crime rates, the percentage of Massachusetts residents behind bars has tripled since the early 1980s, as the Commonwealth has clung to tough-on-crime laws that many other states have abandoned as ineffective, according to a study being released this week.

How on earth can they say the laws are ineffective when they also describe the crime rates as declining steeply? Isn’t that what the laws are intended to accomplish?

Rewrite: “Because ‘the Commonwealth has clung to tough-on-crime laws that many other states have abandoned as ineffective,’ violent crime rates in Massachusetts have declined steeply.”

Isn’t that a better explanation of the facts? How ass-backward is your thinking to miss it?

3 Comments »

  1. Bloodthirsty Liberal said,

    March 25, 2013 @ 2:07 pm

    How ass-backward is your thinking to miss it?

    BTL, I think we both know the answer to that question. Our politicians are dopes, and the public elects them. We’re idiots! :)

    - Aggie

  2. mrzee said,

    March 25, 2013 @ 5:59 pm

    A couple of years ago I read an almost identical statement in my local newspaper in Toronto, Canada and I thought to myself “This can’t be real”

  3. Bloodthirsty Liberal said,

    March 25, 2013 @ 6:02 pm

    Oh, yes. It’s real. When thoughts are banished and feelings rule, that is the sort of logic we end up with.

    - Aggie

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment