The Democrat War On Women

Can we shorten women’s lives? Yes WE Can!

By denying coverage to spouses, employers not only save the annual premiums, but also the new fees that went into effect as part of the Affordable Care Act. This year, companies have to pay $1 or $2 “per life” covered on their plans, a sum that jumps to $65 in 2014. And health law guidelines proposed recently mandate coverage of employees’ dependent children (up to age 26), but husbands and wives are optional. “The question about whether it’s obligatory to cover the family of the employee is being thought through more than ever before,” says Helen Darling, president of the National Business Group on Health.

OK, Let’s make sure that we are all following this. ObamaCare, a 2,000 page law that was passed without having been read, encourages employers to dump the spouses of employees. You and your wife decided that you wanted a parent to raise the kids for a certain amount of time? Tough luck, stupid!! Because although the kids will be covered, Mommy won’t be.

While surcharges for spousal coverage are more common, last year, 6% of large employers excluded spouses, up from 5% in 2010, as did 4% of huge companies with at least 20,000 employees, twice as many as in 2010, according to human resources firm Mercer. These “spousal carve-outs,” or “working spouse provisions,” generally prohibit only people who could get coverage through their own job from enrolling in their spouse’s plan.

Such exclusions barely existed three years ago, but experts expect an increasing number of employers to adopt them: “That’s the next step,” Darling says. HMS, a company that audits plans for employers, estimates that nearly a third of companies might have such policies now. Holdouts say they feel under pressure to follow suit.

“We’re the last domino,” says Duke Bennett, mayor of Terre Haute, Ind., which is instituting a spousal carve-out for the city’s health plan, effective July 2013, after nearly all major employers in the area dropped spouses.

But when employers drop spouses, they often lose more than just the one individual, when couples choose instead to seek coverage together under the other partner’s employer. Terre Haute, which pays $6 million annually to insure nearly 1,200 people including employees and their family members, received more than 20 new plan members when a local university, bank and county government stopped insuring spouses, according to Bennett. “We have a great plan, so they want to be on ours. All we’re trying to do is level the playing field here,” he says.

But experts say more firms are likely to drop spouses altogether, whether they work or not—especially when the new federal health-care exchanges open in 2014, providing an alternative for spouses left out in the cold. “When there’s a place for people to go, employers won’t feel as beholden or compelled to cover the spouse,” says Joan Smyth, an employee benefits consultant with Mercer.

Firms that recently decided to drop spouses from their plans range from private insurance agencies to school systems and universities like Ball State, as well as large companies like pump and valve manufacturer Flowserve. Wisconsin-based furniture company KI carved out spouses this year when couples flocked to its plan for the first time during open enrollment. “Now, each employer is responsible for its own employee,” says Timothy Van Severen, corporate risk manager for KI, which insures about 1,700 employees in its health plan. “We were going to see a higher claim cost if we didn’t do that, because of the migration coming back to us.”

So, under ObamaCare, companies have to cover “children” up to the age of 26, but not spouses. So, if you are a woman with a 25 year old “child”, I’m guessing you’re at least 50 years old. A perfect time in life to pick up breast cancer, colon cancer, all sorts of joint problems… but you’re not covered! Your 25 year old son or daughter is covered. They’re paying for birth control pills, thank heavens.

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor… Hahahahahahahahahah… oh my sides!!! And you all voted for this. As a woman, you are owned by The Democrat Party. Mammograms suck, right? We all hate them. And soon we won’t have to have them. Thank you, Barack Obama. I see your genius now.

- Aggie

3 Comments »

  1. Judi said,

    February 22, 2013 @ 7:32 pm

    I’m starting to think Obamacare might not be that good :(

  2. Buck O'Fama said,

    February 22, 2013 @ 8:01 pm

    Well, we should be glad that Obama is so effing smart. It would really make people mad if all this havoc (not to mention the havoc to come) was caused by some stupid idiot.

  3. Bloodthirsty Liberal said,

    February 22, 2013 @ 11:37 pm

    I have a certain young woman in mind, you know the type. She is smart, worked hard in college, started a career, got married, had a couple of kids. She and her husband planned for her to stay home for a few years, until the kids start school, at which time she will either return to work part-time or full-time, according to her wishes. But it turns out that she can’t spend a few years with the kids because she won’t have any health care. Her head is going to explode.

    - Aggie

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment