Obama: “Peace In Our Time”

Sorry.. no one that is actually intelligent uses the phrase “peace in our time” as a reference to actual peace. Peace in our time stands for WWII, the Holocaust, and the general destruction of Europe, Japan, Russia, etc. Only a complete idiot would use that language without irony.

Via Tom Ricks at Foreign Policy Blog, Obama’s 2nd inaugural address: ‘Peace in our time’? Really, Mr. President?

The WTF moment for me in Obama’s second inaugural address, delivered Monday at noon, was his use of the phrase “peace in our time.” This came during his discussion of foreign policy, and in such circles, that phrase is a synonym for appeasement, especially of Hitler by Neville Chamberlain in September 1938. What signal does his using it send to Iran? I hope he was just using it to jerk Netanyahu’s chain.

Here’s the full sentence:

And we must be a source of hope to the poor, the sick, the marginalized, the victims of prejudice – not out of mere charity, but because peace in our time requires the constant advance of those principles that our common creed describes: tolerance and opportunity; human dignity and justice.

Obamaphiles can’t have it both ways.

Either, as they say, he’s the most brilliant speech writer ever who carefully crafts his texts to bring forward historical analogies — in which case he used the phrase deliberately which is frightening – or he’s way overblown and did it without realizing the significance.

Back to our basic question: Is he the village idiot or is he malevolent? In this case, I’m guessing that it’s just ignorance.

- Aggie

4 Comments »

  1. Buck O'Fama said,

    January 22, 2013 @ 10:03 pm

    Obama builds Potemkin Villages and all the royal sycophants are adamant that they are real. One day, the wind blows and the truth is revealed.

  2. Bloodthirsty Liberal said,

    January 22, 2013 @ 10:32 pm

    Ah, but will we live long enough to see this, Buck? It is so discouraging.

    - Aggie

  3. DavidD said,

    January 23, 2013 @ 7:11 am

    Actually, it’s both–he’s a malevolent idiot.

  4. Bloodthirsty Liberal said,

    January 23, 2013 @ 7:19 am

    Well put, David! But he’s our Malevolent Idiot.

    - Aggie

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment