Your Effete’s Too Big

Former Father of the Year (2007), John Edwards, used to say there were two Americas. I don’t know if he’s right, but there are two Americas on the issue of gun ownership.

One America is the liberal elite in the media and academia. The other America is everyone else:

The Manchester Gun Show. It’s like walking into Super Stop & Shop, except every aisle is filled with killing machines.

AK-47 assault rifles like the one Michael “Mucko” McDermott used to slaughter seven in Wakefield. Glock 9mm pistols like the one Jared Loughner used to murder six and wound Congresswoman Gabby Giffords in Arizona. Bushmaster AR-15s, like the one used in the Aurora, Colo., movie theater and, right around Christmas, to murder firefighters in ?upstate New York, shoppers in an ?Oregon mall and 20 first-graders in Newtown, Conn.

Then there were tables and ?tables of high-capacity magazines, bullets, shell casings; “Splattering Targets” for $12 (they splatter “blood” when hit); “Chicks With Guns” books; body armor; Sig Sauer backpacks; and antique grenades, swords, World War II helmets, Swastikas and a German ?machine gun nicknamed “Hitler’s Buzz Saw.”

And for the lady gunslinger, “deep concealment holsters,” $45, which would hold her weapon snugly beneath her bra.

“You could arm yourself here to start a revolution,” said John Rosenthal, the gun-control ?activist who was in Manchester yesterday, too. The line wound out the door and down the block. I waited an hour and a half to get in with gun buyers worried about an anti-gun president.

“Hope and change,” scoffed the man behind me.

“Killing machines”, “arm yourself here to start a revolution”, assigning every make and model to a killing spree—why should people fear a gun ban? The reporter sounds so reasonable!

But I just have to laugh. What did she think of the long line and the wait to get in? Did she acknowledge these people as her neighbors? Did she consider their investment in time and money to exercise their rights? Or are they just faceless monsters?

Lest I leave the impression that every person at the gun show was a white male, let me clarify: There were a few women and children, some in tiny camouflage gear.

Leah Morgano, 31, of Milford described a “passion for guns.” Then I asked if she supports a high-capacity magazine ban. They’ve been used in every mass shooting for 20 years, ?after all.

Maybe because she was young, friendly, pretty — and a woman — I’d expected she’d agree with a modest proposal to make it harder to kill so many so fast.

She didn’t.

Of course she didn’t. She’s not planning to kill anyone; neither was anyone else there. Amazingly, so many people—men—owning so many guns, there wasn’t a firefight or a shootout of any sort. The reporter must have feared for her life!

I liked this comment by one Ozark_Hillbilly:

Just curious, when you go to a car lot, do you make note of which model cars are driven by drunk drivers killing and maiming more people than any other device? When you go to a liquor store, do you make note of the brand or brew most often selected by those who commit violent abuse to their spouse or children? Now there’s a story we will never see in Boston: alcohol comsumption causes more harm than good; President calls for reasonable restrictions, waiting periods, and prevents alcoholics, parolees, and convicted felons from purchase, possession or consumption. Oh well, life is full of ironies, great and small. Everything said about a firearm goes doubly or triply so, for alcoholic drinks.

2 Comments »

  1. Joe said,

    January 13, 2013 @ 8:45 am

    Guns don’t kill people , people kill people, therefore it is the people that need control and restrictions not the guns !

  2. Buck O'Fama said,

    January 13, 2013 @ 3:28 pm

    You know, all these stories about things the journ0listic establishment doesn’t like – whether it be guns, fracking, NASCAR races or whatever – all follow the same pattern. The “reporter” goes to visit the target with the pretense of impartiality (“just going to see what makes these people tick”) and lo and behold, finds a bunch of stupid, obsessed crazy people indulged in some bizarre activity that no “intelligent” person (like someone who reads that paper and/or watches that newscast) would be caught dead doing. After finding what he/she/it expected to find (but pretended not to be looking for), the sarcastic ironies start to flow and he/she/it leaves the scene, figuratively shaking the head, wondering how the world is going to survive with so many idiots that don’t agree with the journ0listic establishment in it.

    The pattern is so predictable, there’s no need to watch or read these morons whatsoever. You already know what they’re going to say and how they’re going to say it. Puke.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment