Your Government at Work—on You

FISA warrant? We don’t need no stinkin’ FISA warrant!

Top U.S. intelligence officials gathered in the White House Situation Room in March to debate a controversial proposal. Counterterrorism officials wanted to create a government dragnet, sweeping up millions of records about U.S. citizens—even people suspected of no crime.

Not everyone was on board. “This is a sea change in the way that the government interacts with the general public,” Mary Ellen Callahan, chief privacy officer of the Department of Homeland Security, argued in the meeting, according to people familiar with the discussions.

A week later, the attorney general signed the changes into effect.

Through Freedom of Information Act requests and interviews with officials at numerous agencies, The Wall Street Journal has reconstructed the clash over the counterterrorism program within the administration of President Barack Obama. The debate was a confrontation between some who viewed it as a matter of efficiency—how long to keep data, for instance, or where it should be stored—and others who saw it as granting authority for unprecedented government surveillance of U.S. citizens.

If they can help me find my keys in the morning, I’m on board!

The rules now allow the little-known National Counterterrorism Center to examine the government files of U.S. citizens for possible criminal behavior, even if there is no reason to suspect them. That is a departure from past practice, which barred the agency from storing information about ordinary Americans unless a person was a terror suspect or related to an investigation.

Now, NCTC can copy entire government databases—flight records, casino-employee lists, the names of Americans hosting foreign-exchange students and many others. The agency has new authority to keep data about innocent U.S. citizens for up to five years, and to analyze it for suspicious patterns of behavior. Previously, both were prohibited. Data about Americans “reasonably believed to constitute terrorism information” may be permanently retained.

I supported Bush’s initiatives to keep the country safe, so a knee-jerk critical reaction would be hypocritical. But that doesn’t seem to have stopped the loud-mouthed libs who screamed bloody murder for eight years under Bush from biting their tongue now. What’s the problem, progressives—’fraid someone will be listening in? They already are!

And they’re listening a lot more intently to a lot more of us than ever before. I say feel free. And if they can help out by finding matches for all my single socks I’d really appreciate it.

And I’m low on milk.

Leave a Comment