A U.N. report ridiculed worldwide for lavishing praise on the Qaddafi regime’s human rights record was unanimously adopted today by the 47-nation UN Human Rights Council, with president Laura Dupuy Lasserre overruling the objection made in the plenary by UN Watch.
After it was first exposed by UN Watch last year, the report card giving high marks to Qaddafi was mocked by the New York Times, The Economist and other major media worldwide, causing a red-faced UN to postpone the report’s adoption repeatedly — until today.
Even ardent defenders of the council are slamming the report. Echoing UN Watch’s recent protest, Suzanne Nosssel, the head of Amnesty USA and former top human rights official in the Obama Administration, described the Libya report as “abhorrent,” and called for a complete “redo.”
That’s what I would say about the Obama regime—but that’s for another time!
UN Watch tried to tell them:
In the 16th session last year we outlined our grave concerns with this report, which records this council’s 2010 review of Libya’s human rights record under the rule of Col. Moammar Qaddafi.
As delegates here know, for years UN Watch brought victims of Libyan torture to testify before this council, including Bulgarian nurse Kristyana Valchyeva, Ashraf al-Hajouj and the brother of Fathi Eljahmi. Libyan delegates rudely interrupted them, and called them liars.
In May 2010, we pleaded for Libya not to be elected to this council. Tragically, our voice was ignored; it was elected in great numbers. Not a single country spoke in opposition.
For the victims, is that too much to ask?
Allow me simply to point out that changes of government are normal, and the responsibilities of states continue, and what is important is the commitment undertaken by governments and the implementation thereof. […]
I propose that the council adopt the decision on the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Libya, as you currently see it on the screen.
I see no objection to approving this decision, therefore it is hereby adopted. Thank you very much.
No, thank you, Madame President. All the fire and brimstone I spew about the United Nations is nothing to what you all say about yourselves.
One question, though: isn’t the USA still on the Council? If the report whitewashing Qaddafi’s human rights record was approved unanimously—and it was—Obama’s representative (our representative) must have been on board.