By Their Panic Shall Ye Know Them

If I didn’t know better, I’d say the Democrats are beginning to sweat.

Not one of them wants to be seen with Obama, much less say they voted for the oaf (except for the 99% they supported him in Congress). But as the election gets closer, and the polls turn against them, the cold terror is showing. And terror is what they sow.

Women:

WOMAN: Did you try the corner market?

MAN: Of course!

WOMAN: Grocery store?

MAN: Sold out.

WOMAN: Drugstore?

MAN: Come on.

WOMAN: So everyone’s sold out of condoms. Humph! How did this happen?

MAN: Cory Gardner banned birth control, and now it’s all on us guys, and you can’t find a condom anywhere — and the pill was just the start. The Pell Grants my little brother was counting on for college? Cory cut them. Climate change that everyone knows is weirding our weather? Cory flat-out denies it. Sweet Pea, Cory denies science.

Do you ladies have the vapors? Are you feeling faint? But I’m bothered by “Sweet Pea” most of all. That’s what I call the Bloodthirsty Puppy.

But that’s nothing to how Democrats are spooking African Americans.

Charlie Rangel:

“[T]he thing is, everything we believe in, everything we believe in they hate! They don’t disagree, they hate! They think that if you didn’t come from Europe 30 years ago, we shouldn’t have immigration! Some of them believe that slavery isn’t over, and that they won the Civil War.”

No, Charlie, Republicans know the North won the Civil War and that slavery was abolished—because Republicans did it.

We told you this morning how Mary Landrieu slandered her constituents as hostile to blacks and women (her own example to the contrary). But Democrats don’t have to make sense. They have to sow fear.

Or comedy:

The week before Election Day, the lone African-American candidate for statewide office in Ohio this year accused her opponent of racism.

Nina Turner says an attack ad from her opponent, Republican Secretary of State Jon Husted, is “ vicious, racist and sexist.”

The comments from Turner, a state senator from Cleveland, came on Tuesday when she was asked about the ad during a debate in Cleveland. She said the use of unflattering black-and-white photographs of her is a racist “dog whistle,” according to a report from the Northeast Ohio Media Group.

“I’m calling it the way that I see it. It was deliberate for him to put me in black and white and to put it in the minds of voters, to paint me as the other,” Turner said.

Of course black-and-white photography is racist; it’s right there in black and white.

But look beyond these disparate examples to what they betray about the attitudes toward their intended audience. Republicans want women barefoot and pregnant, they want blacks enslaved, or at least photographed in monochrome. Ladies, African Americans, whatever you may think Republicans think of you, could it be any lower than what Democrats think of you? The stereotype of the petrified black man is one of the ugliest in the history of racism. The timid, anxious woman defending her virtue is little better. But they’re awfully handy come election time. If that’s how you roll.

Comments (2)

Don’t Make Me Get Glick on You

I don’t do it often, but sometimes I have to bring out the big guns.

Here’s the JDAM of journalists, Caroline Glick:

Yehudah Glick has spent the better part of the last 20 years championing the right of Jews to pray on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem – Judaism’s holiest site. On Wednesday night, the Palestinians sent a hit man to Jerusalem to kill him.

And today Glick lays in a coma at Shaare Zedek Medical Center.

Two people bear direct responsibility for this terrorist attack: the gunman, and Palestinian Authority President and PLO chief Mahmoud Abbas. The gunman shot Glick, and Abbas told him to shoot Glick.

Abbas routinely glorifies terrorist murder of Jews, and funds terrorism with the PA’s US- and European-funded budget.

But it isn’t often that he directly incites the murder of Jews.

Two weeks ago, Abbas did just that. Speaking to Fatah members, he referred to Jews who wish to pray at Judaism’s holiest site as “settlers.” He then told his audience that they must remain on the Temple Mount at all times to block Jews from entering.

“We must prevent them from entering [the Temple Mount] in any way…. They have no right to enter and desecrate [it]. We must confront them and defend our holy sites,” he said.

As Palestinian Media Watch reported Thursday, in the three days leading up to the assassination attempt on Glick, the PA’s television station broadcast Abbas’s call for attacks on Jews who seek to enter the Temple Mount 19 times.

While Abbas himself is responsible for the hit on Glick, he has had one major enabler – the Obama administration. Since Abbas first issued the order for Palestinians to attack Jews, there have been two terrorist attacks in Jerusalem. Both have claimed American citizens among their victims. Yet the Obama administration has refused to condemn Abbas’s call to murder Jews either before it led to the first terrorist attack or since Glick was shot Wednesday night.

Oh, but the Obama regime has something to say:

“The Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount must be re-opened to Muslim worshipers and I support the long-standing practices regarding non-Muslim visitors to the site, consistent with respect for the status quo arrangements governing religious observance there,” said Kerry.

What the [bleep] does that even mean? Does anyone with half a brain in his head think it’s smart to allow these marauders to have the run of the place after Friday prayers? You think Halloween here can get out of hand…

Back to Glick:

Not only have the White House and the State Department refused to condemn Abbas for soliciting the murder of Jews. They have praised him and attacked Israel and its elected leader. In other words, they are not merely doing nothing, they are actively rewarding Abbas’s aggression, and so abetting it.

Since Abbas called for Palestinians to kill Jews, the White House and State Department have accused Israel of diminishing the prospect of peace by refusing to make massive concessions to Abbas. The concessions the Americans are demanding include accepting the ethnic cleansing of all Jews from land they foresee becoming part of a future Palestinian state; denying Jews the rights to their lawfully held properties in predominantly Arab neighborhoods; and abrogating urban planning procedures in Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem built within the areas of the city that Israel took control over from Jordan in 1967.

The most distressing aspect of Goldberg’s ["chickensh*t"] quotes is that in and of themselves, these profane, schoolyard bully personal attacks against Israel’s elected leader were the mildest part of the story.

The most disturbing thing about the gutter talk is what they tell us about Israel’s role in Obama’s assessments of his political cards as they relate to his nuclear negotiations with Iran.

The senior administration officials called Netanyahu a coward because, among other reasons, he has not bombed Iran’s nuclear installations.

And now, they crowed, it’s too late for Israel to do anything to stop Iran.

They are happy about this claimed state of affairs, because now Obama is free to make a deal with the Iranians that will allow them to develop nuclear weapons at will.

The obscene rhetoric they adopted in their characterization of Netanyahu didn’t come from “red hot anger.” It was a calculated move. Obama knows that he has caved in on every significant redline that he claimed he would defend in the nuclear talks with Iran.

Obama has chosen to demonize Netanyahu and castigate Israel now as a means to transform the debate about Iran into a debate about Israel. The fact that the trash talk about Netanyahu was a premeditated bid to capture the discourse on Iran is further exposed by the fact that Obama has refused to take any action against the officials who made the statements.

He isn’t going to punish them for carrying out his policies.

She’s not getting older. She’s getting better:

No Israel leader has done more to appease a US administration than Netanyahu has done to appease Obama. Against the opposition of his party and the general public, Netanyahu in 2009 bowed to Obama’s demand to embrace the goal of establishing a Palestinian state.

Against the opposition of his party and the general public, in 2010 Netanyahu bowed to Obama’s demand and enacted an official 10-month moratorium on Jewish property rights in lands beyond the 1949 armistice lines, and later enacted an unofficial moratorium on those rights.

And Netanyahu bowed to Obama’s pressure, released murderers from prison and conducted negotiations with Abbas that only empowered Abbas and his political war to delegitimize and isolate Israel.

And for all his efforts to appease Obama, today the administration abets Palestinian terrorism and political warfare.

As to Iran, Netanyahu agreed to play along with Obama’s phony sanctions policy, and bowed to Obama’s demand not to attack Iran’s nuclear installations. All of this caused suffering to the Iranian people while giving the regime four-and-a-half years of more or less unfettered work on its nuclear program.

Netanyahu only cut bait after Obama signed the interim nuclear deal with Iran last November where he effectively gave up the store.

Before formulating a strategy for dealing with Obama over the next two years, Israelis need to first take a deep breath and recognize that as bad as things are going to get, nothing that Obama will do to us over the next two years is as dangerous as what he has already done. No anti-Israel Security Council resolution, no Obama map of Israel’s borders will endanger Israel as much as his facilitation of Iran’s nuclear program.

As unpleasant as anti-Israel Security Council resolutions will be, and as unpleasant as an Obama framework for Israel’s final borders will be, given the brevity of his remaining time in power, it is highly unlikely that any of the measures will have lasting impact.

At any rate, no matter how upsetting such resolutions may be, Goldberg’s article made clear that Israel should make no concessions to Obama in exchange for a reversal of his plans. Concessions to Obama merely escalate his contempt for us.

Bearing this in mind, Israel’s required actions in the wake of Goldberg’s sources’ warnings are fairly straightforward.

First, to the extent that Israel does have the capacity to damage Iran’s nuclear installations, Israel should act right away. Its capacity should not be saved for a more propitious political moment.

The only clock Israel should care about is Iran’s nuclear clock.

I did try to cut, believe me. It’s just that good. But two points in particular stand out. One, the worst damage has already been done. Who would ever imagine that the state of affairs between the two allies would be in such a shambles? How could it be any worse?

Even more important, the Obamaguppenfuhrers practically called out Israel. Not just about being chicken (who cares?), but by declaring their intentions to let Iran win. Israel’s move. As the old joke goes, in a breakfast of bacon and eggs, the hen was involved, but the pig was committed. America can barely bother to be involved. And Obama needs to be committed.

See you after prayers.

Comments

I Was Wr…Wr…Wro-o-o-on-n-n….

Wrong:

Of the 68,541 unaccompanied illegal alien children who entered the U.S. in fiscal year 2014, none were reported to have the enterovirus, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.

CNSNews.com asked, “Just to clarify, you’re saying that none of the unaccompanied minors who have entered the U.S. had the enterovirus?”

“There were none reported to the Office of Refugee Resettlement,” Kenneth Wolfe, spokesman for the Administration of Children and Families for the Department of Health and Human Services, told CNSNews.com in an emailed response.

I said that the enterovirus outbreak was caused by these kids without medical screening being scattered across the country. I said I would stick by that belief until it was proven otherwise.

I’m almost there:

However, evidence buried in peer-reviewed medical journals provides support for the argument enterovirus D-68, or EV-D68, in the United States was a relatively rare disease. The EV-D68 epidemic occurred only after the surge this year of unaccompanied alien children illegally crossing the border from Latin America, a region where the virus is more prevalent among young children.

Jane Orient, M.D., of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, responded to the Centers for Disease Control’s denial of a causal link between the virus and the surge of illegal-alien minors.

“Keep in mind that Latin American children likely have some immunity and may not be sick, while still contagious,” she told WND.

The concern is that Latin American children in the U.S. might be carriers of EV-D68 even if they display no symptoms of the disease. It can be spread, the study said, by sneezing, coughing and the poor bathroom hygiene commonly found among Latin American unaccompanied alien children. The disease can be transmitted by “feces-to-mouth” contact between an infected person showing no symptoms and a previously uninfected person.

WND reported last week, a peer-reviewed article by German medical doctors challenges a key CDC assumption regarding Ebola, concluding patients who show no symptoms can still transmit a virus like Ebola to another person by a sneeze or a cough.

“Some serious work needs to be done to get to the bottom of this,” Orient said, suggesting a Freedom of Information Act request of CDC confirmations of EV-D68 patient records might reveal important information about how the disease is being contracted in the current epidemic.

I have no evidence that kids raised in the Guatemalan health care system (hah!) are infecting American kids with enterovirus (though TB is another matter). But the blanket statement that not one of the 68,541 abandoned alien kids had the virus? Please. Stop.

That’s the same “settled science” that led to Thomas Eric Duncan infecting two nurses in Dallas. For the love of God, please stop lying to us.

Then I’ll admit I was wr…wro…mistaken.

Comments

Three Race-Card Monte

[Bleep] subtle.

What’s your point?

MO ELLEITHEE, DNC COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR: I think, our continued outreach in the African-America community specifically–

CRAIG MELVIN [MSNBC]: Are those specific efforts appropriate?

ELLEITHEE: Look, do I think it is appropriate to constantly remind people how important it is to vote? How important it is to make your voice heard and remain engaged, and if you don’t you lose your voice…

MELVIN: Can you not do that without trotting out images of dead black teenagers?

ELLEITHEE: Look, I think there are a lot of important issues in the community that we are out there talking about. The DNC is running radio ads reminding people of the need to get behind the economic agenda that we’ve been pushing, so there are a lot of different mechanisms that we’re using out there.

“Mechanisms”. “Dead black teenagers” are “mechanisms”.

I understand wanting to win elections, but when you’ve sold your soul (pun very much intended), what do you have left?

Do we former Democrats have to be de-Democratized, as other monsters had to be deprogrammed before being released into society? I think Aggie and I are safe to be around, but there are some pretty unsavory types out there. You can spot them with their Elizabeth Warren bumper stickers.

PS: Or Landrieu:

“I’ll be very, very honest with you. The South has not always been the friendliest place for African-Americans,” Landrieu said. “It’s been a difficult time for the president to present himself in a very positive light as a leader.”

And Boston has? Howard Beach, Queens? What the hell is her point? You could throw a dart at a map of the US and hit a town that has known something like racism. Up to and including Harlem, I might add. It’s called being human.

PS: Besides, some racism is worse than others:

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has sparked debate this week with remarks he made during an appearance at Florida’s Palm Beach Atlantic University, debate which Noah Rothman observed is sometimes one-sided. On Wednesday morning’s NewsOne Now, however, host Roland Martin devoted two segments to Justice Thomas’ comments about race, and even agreed with him on the subject of white liberal racism in the North.

“The soft bigotry of low expectations” strikes again.

PPS: And speaking of low:

“If they were to hit 30 percent of the vote being African-American, they’re in the game,” Ralph Reed, the Republican political operative in Atlanta and longtime Christian conservative activist, says of the Georgia Democrats. “Anything below that, and they’ll lose. Anything above that, and it’s probably too close to call.”

To reach that threshold, Democrats in the state have gone nasty in recent days: They are stirring up racial fears in the black community, outraging conservatives and talk radio hosts in the state who call it racial demagoguery at its worst.

“If you want to prevent another Ferguson in their future,” reads one inflammatory mailer sent to black residents in the state. “Vote.”

The flier references the events in Ferguson this summer where a white cop shot and killed a black man.

Showing a photo of two children holding “Don’t Shoot” signs, the flier says: “It’s up to you to make change happen.”

Like the shopkeeper made change for Michael Brown? Oh wait, he didn’t. Brown shoplifted and physically intimidated the guy.

Comments

Mayor Menino, RIP

Boston’s longtime mayor, Thomas Menino, died this morning. He had been battling cancer, and had recently ended treatment. He left office earlier this year, after serving five terms.

I will not speak ill of the dead, but I never got the attraction people felt toward him. That’s due, in part, to my not from being from around here (we moved here two years into his first term). He was a thoroughly townie guy, which was his strength and his weakness. A strength in that he had no pretensions, no delusions of grandeur. As local scribe (and merciless Menino gadfly) Howie Carr liked to recall, he was a driver for another Democratic hack in the old days, before winning a seat on the City Council from the Hyde Park District. Serving a decade on the council, he eventually became its president.

When Bill Clinton appointed then-Mayor Ray Flynn to be Ambassador to the Vatican, Menino seen his opportunity, and he took it. He won the eight-person (seven of whom ere exceedingly forgettable) primary with less than 27% of the vote, but romped in the general with over 64%. Only once in following elections did he get less than 60% of the vote. For the “Shitty of Boston” (as he pronounced it), he was Mistah Mayah. Like I said, as an outsider (even one almost two decades in residence), and one living outside of Boston proper, I didn’t get it.

I heard the malapropisms, the small-town mentality, even sometimes the mean-spiritedness (toward gun-owner’s rights and toward Chick-fil-a—only the Second and First Amendments to the Constitution). I always considered him an uninspiring leader for a great city (or at least a pretty good one).

But what do I know? Boston was run fairly well (or no worse than expected) on his watch (if you don’t blame him for the Big Dig). This is a city of neighborhoods (even parishes in some minds), and he certainly represented that point of view. He stayed close to the people.

That’s what I’ve been hearing the last few weeks, and most of all today. People liked him. They felt they knew him, that he was one of them. For better or worse he was. Again, that would not be my first criterion for civic leader, but the self-styled Athens of America resembles Mayberry more than it likes to admit.

Comments

But She’s Got a Nice Personality

I must have a fascination for the grotesque, the macabre, the ghastly. I am fascinated by stories of plague (Ebola), raping and pillaging (ISIS and Boko Haram), mass psychosis (everything Palestinian Arab)…

…and Lena Dunham.

Untitled

Strangely, it’s only the last that makes my skin crawl:

Lena Dunham has taken over the internet – at least when it comes to some of her fellow celebrities.

The 28-year-old posted a topless photo of herself to Instagram on Thursday, tying in both her new book Not That Kind Of Girl and a campaign to get people to vote for women’s rights.

The Girls creator’s naked selfie followed a series of pictures posted by some of Hollywood’s biggest leading ladies, who all proudly wore a shirt advertising the dual campaign with the slogan ‘Lena Loves Planned Parenthood’ emblazoned across their chests.

She captioned the montage: ‘These dream women stand for equality and justice. And they encourage you to vote November 4th.’

What Lena really loves is abortion, which is the bulk of Planned Parenthood’s services (as we’ve addressed before).

This is America, and Lena can love any organization she wants. (I love the International Cheer Union, “the recognized world governing body of Cheerleading”, myself.) But what Lena loves even more than abortion is Lena herself, all of her. She claims to be “not that kind of girl”, but I am hard pressed—no, let me rephrase—at a loss to explain what kind of girl she is. Other than dumpy.

And no, that’s not just my quaint Bloodthirstan sexism; it’s Lena herself. She’s a dumpling, and she sells it better than anyone since Joyce Chen. Again, that’s American greatness in action. I just don’t remember male American tubbos using their bodies to promote favorite political causes. Fatty Arbuckle on women’s suffrage? No idea. Chris Farley on gays in the military? Not a clue.

Now that I think of it, however, fat chicks in entertainment can’t shut up about their politics: Roseanne Barr, Rosie O’Donnell, Oprah (at times), Lena. I’m tempted to say it’s because they have their gobs open all the time, but that would be my quaint Bloodthirstan sexism talking. I’ll just leave it as an observation.

And conclude by saying this election can’t come soon enough. The less I see of Lena Dunham, the better. (I don’t want to see anything at all.) God knows what she’ll be tweeting in 2016. [Shudder.]

PS: We now return to more palatable subjects, like genocide and enterovirus.

Comments

Drones Flying Over French Nuke Sites

Don’t worry; be happy.

Unidentified drones big enough to carry explosives have flown over as many as seven nuclear power plants around France in the past three weeks, it has emerged.
Electricité de France (EDF), the state-owned operator of France’s 58 nuclear reactors across 19 sites, has filed a legal complaint against persons unknown following the flights over seven sites.
Sparking fears that the country’s reactors are unsafe from airborne attack, none of the drones were intercepted and their origins remain a mystery.

It is forbidden to enter airspace within a five kilometre perimeter around nuclear sites or to fly over them at an altitude of below 1,000 metres.
Yet, on October 5, a drone flew over the nuclear plant at Creys-Malville in Isère, southeastern

This was followed by airspace incursions in Gravelines, in the north, Cattenom, in eastern Moselle, Le Blayais in the western Gironde area, Bugey in eastern central, Chooz in the northeastern Ardennes and Nogent-sur-Seine southeast of Paris.

In one case, on October 19, drones were flown at the same time over several sites hundreds of miles apart. At least one of the unmanned aircraft was big enough to carry a bomb, experts said.
“We’re not talking about just one type of drone identified, but several,” a nuclear expert told Le Parisien
.

Hmm. Sounds like a great thriller plot. Arab terrorist group (ISIS, Hamas, whomever..) decides to destroy France by making it radioactive. Pepe Le Pew has to rescue his country from the evil geniuses. Can he succeed? With the help of Barack Obama’s fearless dog, Bo, anything is possible. Let’s hope The White House doesn’t get skunked.

– Aggie

Comments

CDC: Ebola Can Spread Through Sneezing

Just in time for flu season!

Ebola is a lot easier to catch than health officials have admitted — and can be contracted by contact with a doorknob contaminated by a sneeze from an infected person an hour or more before, experts told The Post Tuesday.

“If you are sniffling and sneezing, you produce microorganisms that can get on stuff in a room. If people touch them, they could be” infected, said Dr. Meryl Nass, of the Institute for Public Accuracy in Washington, DC.
Nass pointed to a poster the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quietly released on its Web site saying the deadly virus can be spread through “droplets.”
“Droplet spread happens when germs traveling inside droplets that are coughed or sneezed from a sick person enter the eyes, nose or mouth of another person,” the poster states.
Nass slammed the contradiction.
“The CDC said it doesn’t spread at all by air, then Friday they came out with this poster,” she said. “They admit that these particles or droplets may land on objects such as doorknobs and that Ebola can be transmitted that way.”

Dr. Rossi Hassad, a professor of epidemiology at Mercy College, said droplets could remain active for up to a day.
“A shorter duration for dry surfaces like a table or doorknob, and longer durations in a moist, damp environment,” Hassad said.

The CDC did not respond to a request for comment.

Is the CDC a JV Team?

– Aggie

Comments

Black Conservatives

I’ll believe it when I see it in the voting booth. But it’s a nice thought.

– Aggie

Comments

Close But No Cigar

He wanted to be a thorn in the throat of Zionism:

Following his release from an Israeli prison two years ago, Moataz Hejazi, the terrorist suspected of shooting right-wing activist Yehuda Glick on Wednesday night, gave an interview to Palestinian TV Al Quds and was quoted as saying “I wish to be a thorn in the throat of the Zionist plan to Judaize Jerusalem.”

Instead, he’s not even gum (or worse) on the sole of their shoe:

The suspect police believed attempted to assassinate Rabbi Yehuda Glick outside the Menachem Begin Heritage Center Wednesday night was killed after exchanging gunfire with police at his east Jerusalem home Thursday morning.

“Counter-terrorism operations surrounded the house of the suspect, and as soon as officers took their positions they were fired upon by the him,” said police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld. “Shots were immediately returned by police killing the suspect.”

Rosenfeld said a subsequent raid of the suspect’s home revealed evidence that he was indeed responsible for Glick’s shooting.

I’m betting (praying) that Rabbi Glick is walking freely on the Temple Mount when whatshisface is long forgotten.

Alas, that day is not today:

After the shooting of Temple Mount activist Yehuda Glick Wednesday night, police closed off the Temple Mount to both Jews and Arabs, for fear that mounting tensions between both sides would erupt into a full-fledged riot.

But witnesses Thursday said that the ban had apparently been partially lifted: Arab Muslims were observed on the Mount, but Jews are not being allowed to ascend.

On his way to the Mount Thursday was MK Moshe Feiglin (Likud), who was set to attempt to visit the Mount along with other MKs and activists.

PS: Glick is a dual Israeli-American citizen. Will the Obama administration demand an explanation from Abbas, as he did from the Israelis after they shot an Arab teen (with American citizenship) for throwing rocks or molotov cocktails?

Comments

Christmas is Coming

Or Hanukkah:

Established in 2009, Piece of History is proud to be Israel’s first design studio focused on creating conceptual, history-oriented, art-toys, prints, t-shirts and more. We are based in Tel-Aviv, Israel, and employ a crew of passionate designers motivated by their love of history and art.

The main purpose of our studio is to create modern (and cool) gifts, collectibles and souvenirs which will be an alternative to the archaic Judaica products. It’s time to take Israeli and Jewish folklore to a modern era. Amen!

Amen indeed!

Of course, “action” may be a little bit of a oversell.

Personlly, I’d love to have a Zionist action figure “in action”:

Comments

“Wife” is an “Evolving Paradigm”

We already knew marriage was an evolving paradigm. Now, it turns out that a wife of 29 years (and a mother of one’s children) isn’t a wife (but remains a mother):

Barely a week after being named the 17th richest member of Congress, liberal firebrand and Democratic Rep. Alan Grayson is refusing to support his estranged wife and their kids, and his wife has turned to government food stamps to support her family, WFTV 9 Orlando reports.

Grayson’s marriage of 29 years dissolved earlier this year when his wife, Lolita Grayson, filed for divorce. A week later, Rep. Grayson asked a court to annul the marriage on the basis of bigamy.

Mr. Grayson is refusing to support his family because he is claiming that she was never divorced from her first husband and therefore their marriage was never legitimate.

He’s got a point. Imagine losing 29 years of your life—having children, a home, a soulmate—to a fraud. I’d leave the bitch (and our bastard children) too.

Seriously (for a moment), You spent more than a third of your allotted years with this woman. I get divorce—but annulment? Child abandonment?

Mrs. Grayson told WFTV 9 Orlando she never thought she would be on food stamps or have her kids on the school lunch, because her husband was “the sole provider,” she said. “I don’t have any money at all. He’s been holding all our money for years and years.”

The congressman’s lawyers dismiss the claim saying that she is abusing public funds, saying that he is still paying the mortgage and phone bills. They are calling it an Election Day ploy to hurt him in the polls.

Despite these claims, Lolita Grayson maintains that the house is in disrepair with mold. “I’m doing this for me and our children, not for him, because I would like to have a good life again,” she concluded.

A reporter from WFTV confirmed the septic tank was leaking in the front of the house and the house was covered in mold.

Women will still vote for Grayson. He still supports abortion, even if he doesn’t support his children.

Comments (1)

« Previous entries Next Page » Next Page »